curl-6 said:
bonzobanana said:
Yes I think most people understand that flops is only a rough guide but it should be roughly in the ball park area and we haven't actually got anything better to compare them by.
I pretty much hated the wii graphically there wasn't much on it that didn't look awful. Mario Galaxy games stood out as very nice because of their artistic style but god forbid the wii tried to do natural realistic graphics beccause it would all go horribly wrong. Lack of digital output too meant a fuzzy image on most tv's even using the component cable. Not a fan of the wii graphically to say the least. Zelda Twilight Princess looked bloody awful to someone who'd got used to ps3 and 360 graphics.
|
When devs played to its strengths, there were quite a few Wii games I thought looked nice; Metroid Prime 3, Sonic Colours, and as you mentioned, the Mario Galaxy games.
Compared to the original Xbox it was apples and oranges; Xbox had more flexibility when it came to pixel shaders, while Wii had more RAM and could perform certain techniques like multitexturing more efficiently.
|
IMO Zelda SS also looked great, I cant wait SS HD. :)