The_Yoda said:
From another instance that i linked above: The campaign says that a limited number of seats forced it to make the tough decision of which journalists would be permitted to follow the Democratic presidential candidate in the last four days of the campaign, but the papers are calling foul, claiming they were targeted for their editorial-page positions and kicked off while nonpolitical publications like Glamour and Jet magazines remained on board.
My bad I forgot Glamour and Jet magazines > Washington Times, the New York Post and the Dallas Morning News This instance is nearly exactly the same cherry picking of Jet and Glamour over real political publications because said publications were critical of him at the time. In my opinion one is just a more eloquent liar than the other but to each their own. |
just avoid it all- life is great without the media and the constant left VS right BS i see.
I swear, i can't believe how some people can think one set of beliefs is magically superior. Always laugh at the people who use terms like "evil left/right", "libtards", etc. Really childish and ignorant behaviour that stems from things that none of us can (unfortunately control). Stays the same, both sides continue to act superior until the end of time.







