zero129 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Im not confused at all. I think you're reading into what I am saying further than you should. I considered it a passive aggressive attack as a whole, since it actions by the company represent the company. One person says one thing and another person says another. At the end of the day Sony was right to call them out on their passive aggressive behavior when they were trying to bring about good faith in the spirit of competition. Despite that though, I still think Phil will continue to congratulate Sony and the only exclusive Microsoft has that could possibly wow if done right (for now) is Crackdown. Lets hope they dont moneyhat another third party game, because like the 360 gen eventually they will run out of luck and have no one to give them high profile titles in the latter years. Last gen they were winning as well and still managed to have a slight drought in the last two years.
If im confused, so is Sony. They respond to PR as is.
|
This is bad when any console maker does it not just MS. Or are you trying to say Sony cant be accused of doing the same thing this gen?.
Sony even used ownership of one of their Movie IP's (Spiderman) to keep the new Spiderman game on their console. Imo this is worse then money hatting some unknown IP or having timed exclusive rights to an IP.
Marvel should really work on getting Spiderman back from Sony imo.
|
And make another crappy Spiderman game at least this spiderman actually looks promising. Besides they pretty much pay for the development of the game. And the game is developed by insomniac which mostly is a Sony Dev anyway except for a flop and sunset overdrive which was also a commercial flop.
