Looks like Phil Spencer is going to be congratulating Sony for their exclusives for a while

[Dravenet7]

S.T.A.G.E. said:

Dravenet7 said:

... Are you even reading at this point? Twisting what words? You mean the full sentences I am taking directly from what you said, word for word, and highlighting? Something is literally not twisted, if it is taken word for word.

To highlight this let's look at what I underlined. This is the line that literally came before your struggle (confusion) to weigh the pros and cons of the argument:

"They have enough free reign to create a upgraded Xbox that is not needed but cannot make better exclusives."

^^^^^^^^^^ That line. The line which you bolded from my last post. The line which I fully explain, if you look literally after the quote where the "<-" is, that this is what you are confused by...

There is no way you read I posted. No way. Because if you did, I wouldn't be reading what you just posted. You essentially restated that you were confused by your own argument.

- It's like you bit a green apple, then a red one, I say that you bit the red one after the green one, and then you claim I changed the story attempt to correct me by saying you ate the green apple before the red one...

...

Now aside from that. Everything bolded and italicized... This is the very first time PC was specifically mentioned. At all. Not even between just our posts, in the thread entirely. You are making this up as you go. "It just makes no sense at all"... (That quote is you highlighting your confusion of your own words. Again. Specifically through the words in italicized.)

The best part of this all is that you just verified that instead of actually dealing with my argument, you replaced it with your own, and then proceeded to get confused by it.

I read what you wrote, but I am clearing my statement as you misconstrued by confusion and where it came from. You're taking apart my statements and not applying context nor meaning to it properly. If this is how you're going to approach speaking, its not going to get very far.  Sorry, but I work too many hours to come back to VGChartz and go through this. Others seemed to get my statement just fine. You're the only one dragging it out this far.

No ones confused by what you're saying. You're picking things apart, claiming someones lost and then running yourself in circles. Im not going down that path. I know exactly what I said and what you said, but theres only so much time in the day for this.

I minscontrued nothing. I was confused by nothing that you said. I knew exactly where each of your lines came from and you are lying through your teeth if you state that I am not applying context as that has all I have been doing since beyond my first post. And speaking of my first post you never once addressed anything I said aside from failing to defend you confusion. Instead of actually responding to my post you replaced it with your own argument. Go ahead and tell me I'm wrong about that. It is laughable you think that you can even begin to criticize how I approach speaking when you actively avoid an argument by replacing with your own. You need to follow your own advice.

So go ahead and clear whatever it is you want to clear. Your posts are already in my responses, and it would be very clear to anyone through reading them, I have properly broken down what you said. You can go "Bu-buh you are misconstruning my words!" as much as you want. The difference is that I actually contiuously proved and backed up what I stated, and you kept adding nonsensical stuff as you went along. 

EDIT: in regards to the part you added later...

No one should be confused by what I was saying. That is precisely why I went into the depth I previously did. Oh and please qoute where I claimed anything along the lines of someone has lost. You can't because tou made that up. That is your fundamental problem. You are not addressing what I actually have said, and replacing it with what you want to be said. If you knew what I said and realize the value of time, then perhaps next actually address what someone else has said instead replacing it with your own arguments that you have confused yourself with.