By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.T.A.G.E. on 22 February 2017
Edit Thread
Dravenet7 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:

Im not confused at all. I think you're reading into what I am saying further than you should. I considered it a passive aggressive attack as a whole, since it actions by the company represent the company. One person says one thing and another person says another. At the end of the day Sony was right to call them out on their passive aggressive behavior when they were trying to bring about good faith in the spirit of competition. Despite that though, I still think Phil will continue to congratulate Sony and the only exclusive Microsoft has that could possibly wow if done right (for now) is Crackdown. Lets hope they dont moneyhat another third party game, because like the 360 gen eventually they will run out of luck and have no one to give them high profile titles in the latter years. Last gen they were winning as well and still managed to have a slight drought in the last two years.

If im confused, so is Sony. They respond to PR as is.

Yeah I'm gonna stop you right there at the bolded...

"I dunno how to weigh the pros and cons of this argument" <- You being confused with an argument.

"They have enough free reign to create a upgraded Xbox that is not needed but cannot make better exclusives." <- The argument you are confused by. Conviently the argument I never made, but you replaced it with your own.

So we can confirm, through your words and arguments alone, you confused yourself. Based on that, it is not me, who read to deeply, but you not reading at all.

As for most of what you said after, I don't have to respond to that... because I already did. You simply chose to change it for your argument. Which, again by your own words, you don't know how to weigh.

As for the Sony thing, no they are not confused. They knew exactly what they were doing. Only you are confused and that is by your own admittance. 

I think it is you who is twisting my words. When I said I dont know how to weigh the pros and cons of the argument I was referring to, it was in context to the sentence which came before that, which was clearly about their priorities with a second console (Since there is no need for one) vs exclusives. I was admitting that I cannot ultimatley get into Microsoft head to understand their logic when they are supposedly trying to prop up their PC market. It just makes no sense at all.

I said, if Microsoft can develop a second console...it is telling about how much free reign they have within the division. Microsoft is fighting a petty battle over graphics, to distract from their glaring issues, which are exclusives. But again...the only thing I admitted I was confused about was their priorities.