S.T.A.G.E. said:
[They have enough free reign to create a upgraded Xbox that is not needed but cannot make better exclusives? I dunno how to weigh the pros and cons of this argument.] Microsoft is going for the petty battle and thats when they will boast just like they did the Xbox S. Sony's response to Microsofts passive aggressive behavior. "While others have shifted their message and changed their story, we were consistent in maintaining a message that is fair and in tune with consumer desires," |
Well I mean yeah when you not only twist words but ommit the actual argument as well, that tends to happen... But don't worry I will give you the step by step as to what just happended:
- You were talking about passive aggresive attacks by Microsoft despite what Phil says. I responded directly to and contested that.
- Instead of responding to that, you proceed to ask a question about hardware and exclusives of Xbox and what they are free to do. As if I said mentioned anything about freedom regarding hardware when I was very clearly talking about Phil's communication in comparison to Microsoft's.
- You proceed to somehow confuse yourself.
- Then you recommit to your original argument as if it was never contested and quote Sony as if it were evidence of something?
The general gist of your confusion is willfull ignorance. As in you willfully removed both the key information and most of the argument, and were confused by the argument you yourself replaced it with. Now if you actually go back and not do that, maybe your confusion will fade.








