BMaker11 said:
What? His statement wasn't abhorrable? He's trying to redefine pedophilia as being attracted to someone who hasn't hit puberty instead of being attracted to a child. He argues that once they've hit puberty, all bets are off. They're an "adult" and can "consent" (even though we have age of consent laws specifically because while you hit puberty at young age, you're still a child). Bear in mind that some kids hit puberty at 9 or 10. In Milo's world, it's ok to fuck them. You're abhorrable for deflecting and, dare I say, defending Milo and his comment and calling it a "witch hunt". |
Did he propose that laws on this should be changed?
My interpretation is that he just means that there are cases where let's say a 16 year old can have sex with an adult and not take any damage (which is true). It's not the end of the world.
