By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
vivster said:
Acevil said:

Yes because the logic of two wrongs make a right, is a good argument. Lets ignore one is actually against the law, and the other has yet to be proven in the court of law (Lets Play being Fair Use). 

This is not about legality or Let's plays for the matter. Nintendo is claiming revenue from people if their content is used in critique, which is by definition fair use, i.e. part of copyright law. It's about morals. Nintendo is obviously morally bankrupt when it ignores clear cases of fair use. So should we respect laws that are meant to protect them if they do not respect laws that protect other content creators?

It's quite philosophical.

...Yes. Obviously.

If it's a question about morals, the answer is yes. Someone being a jerk doesn't give you the moral grounds to be a jerk in return. Like Acevil said, he's just trying to argue why two wrongs make a right. They don't.