oniyide said:
irstupid said:
How about lets bring up a hypothetical FF16.
Let's say they decide to go for some form of graphics of FF13-15 mix up. Something that still looks great, but is able to be on the Switch as well as the One/4
They all release at the same time. Do you really think there is not a market on the Switch. I can see people seeing a handheld final fantasy as a very appealing option. You know not having to be stuck on the same couch for a 100 hours, but being able to play in bed, one bus, at lunch, ect as well as their comfy couch.
And Yes I woudl gladly welcome a downgrade in graphics, if that meant the towns were bigger than a gas station and an RV, or they managed to complete the game and not have some hack/rush job in the last half of the game dropping plotlines, finishign plotlines through notes ont eh floor or learning about the entire 10 year timeskip from a boy telling you about it through optional dialogue.
If we go back to ff13 graphics to make a better story and world, I'm all game. Which, the Switch could handle. Thus in that scenerio, I could see the game selling at least half what PS4 does, and obviusly more than the one.
|
that scenario is most likely not gonna happen. Let's talk about the real scenario which is FF15 is out on the systems that are quite popular and a port of ff15 for Switch is 99% not happening and if it did, it probably would barely move the needle. Not a lot of downgraded games do better than their counterparts, but lets say their is a 16 for all systems. The Switch userbase is still far behind the other two, so It wouldnt even sell half PS4 version, might do as well as Xone and thats cause of Japan
|
There is no point arguing over how well 15 would do on switch.
Regardless if it were a decent port, or a downgraded one, it woudl be coming out too late. We have plenty of evidence that shows late ports always sell like crap.