| zorg1000 said: You are saying handheld gamers wont buy Switch at $300 because they didnt buy 3DS at $250, that is faulty logic. I bring up them having different features/marketing/software because those are the things that will determine the value of the device. If 3DS had awesome features/marketing/software than it may have sold well at $250, those things were not awesome which led to people thinking $250 was too expensive. |
I don't really think it's faulty logic but I do think I could be wrong and you do bring up good points. But I don't see any features/marketing/software that can effectively negate the price barrier, especially a price barrier that is $100-$130 more than the majority of 3DS consumers paid for their handheld device.
It's like how someone stated earlier in the thread that a $300 home console with $60 games and paid online subscription service isn't going to replace the 3DS. The Switch may be too different from what the majority of 3DS owners are used to.
