A_C_E said:
Otherway around I think, I never said 3DS sales at $250 were relevent to potential sales of Switch at $300 in the first place yet you're pointing this out to me as if I said it. The only thing I said was $300 (price of the Switch) was a barrier for the handheld market. The Switch could go on to sell huge amounts of consoles but that doesn't mean it captured the handheld market. That's my point and you didn't address it, instead opting to tell me they have different features with different marketing & software...ok, agreed, lol. I never said they were the same devices and never said they had the same features, marketing & software, which goes without saying... |
You are saying handheld gamers wont buy Switch at $300 because they didnt buy 3DS at $250, that is faulty logic.
I bring up them having different features/marketing/software because those are the things that will determine the value of the device.
If 3DS had awesome features/marketing/software than it may have sold well at $250, those things were not awesome which led to people thinking $250 was too expensive.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.







