New US envoy to UN 'We're taking names'

[Bofferbrauer2]

COX said:

bunchanumbers said:

That won't be a issue. The US will most likely back out of that. Otherwise Russia will have issues taking over the EU. Wouldn't be shocked if the US actually helps in this endeavor.

How can Russia take over the EU ? France has nuclear weapon that would be crazy to attack EU with that kind of threat. Plus if EU feels threaten and start a arms race a doubt Russia has the economic power to be able to compete. Russia doesn't have anything to win to attack EU best case scenario (and I don't believe in it) they win the war after losing a shitone of men and money. 

By mobilizing all their forces and rushing them straigt into Europe. If they can crush them before the european arms industries can react, they could do it. Russia has more weaponry in their reserves than all of EU taken together, so that would be a possibilty. However, their declining population can't support an extended full out war and once it comes to a standstill, they would be fucked.

This of course, if no one intervenes and the nukes getting all neutralized in high athmosphere (on both sides). The british would most probably intervene in europe's favor even after Brexit is achieved, and I don't think Japan would stand idle, either. An US intervention on sides of russia could allivate the pressure for them, but the US troops would have to cross the atlantic first, no easy task if you have the whole european fleet to defeat first and have to develop and build landing ships which can make it all the way across the atlantic first. Besides, I don't think canada and mexico would stay idle and bind many US troops at their borders. And an US intervention would very much force China to support europe, if only to protect their interests. Good morning World War III, everyone!

Damn, now I got so invested, I have to play some hearts of Iron again. Or Supreme Ruler 2020, where I could actually simulate the war