Scoobes said:
Didn't we have that discussion already? Publicly funded research is very different to research and data in private companies. The research and the data generated at companies is owned by the company as either proprietary or IP. It's funded by the investors of that company and they have the right to see how well that company is doing and get updated on progress of whatever product or service the company provides. Public research is paid for by tax payers and unless their are certain circumstances (involved in defence, private company is involved, other legal IP issue) then the information is to be available in the public domain. |
Yes we had... the results are domain of the government (and by the end for the people) so it isn't owned by that particular worker, so it isn't his business speaking about it without authorization
Scoobes said:
Bit of a shit way to do it, relying on other scientists outside of the US to try and combat a false narrative. And if that was actually effective, what is the point of this gag order? Actually, thinking about it, this gag order is kinda useless as a number of unofficial "rogue" accounts have cropped up. I suppose we'll see what they do about these rogue accounts but this could end up being a load of hot air people will laugh about in a few months. |
Yes, it is useless. But we certainly need to compare this to censorship because Trump was the one doing it right?

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







