what scare me is that what is accepted by majority of scientific community is not accepted by government... and donald trump prohibiting them to tweet because it doesn't meet his criteria like i dunno tweeting about 3 million fraud voters without anything to back him is OKAY?
like i said i DID NOT Say it is not a political agenda... i said barely compare to the politician who are recipients of the oil and gas company... and guess what most of them are republican and apparently most republicans still do not buy the concept of global warming... could it be political? esp that the sitting president is from the GOP? could it be more political than a tweet about real numbers about global warming?????
but hey you are the one backing a guy who thinks global warming is hoax by chinese people...
You are really stretching your argument a lot here. First off, I don't think I said anywhere that Donald Trump should be sending tweets about 3 million fraudulent voters, whether it should be allowed or not, etc. It is, quite frankly, completely irrelevent to the argument (if donald trump was a murderer, it doesn't mean its then ok for everybody else to be a murderer)
Also you are going on some huge ass tangent about Republicans not believing in global warming. Pretty sure I am with a lot of people that aren't necessarily denying global warming, but rather the cause of it, and whether the solutions are worthwhile/reasonable.
You then make a final comment about backing Donald Trump. Keep in mind the difference in backing a candidate versus trying to shut down an argument that I find foolish against him.
Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.