bonzobanana said:
Well the original eurogamer article on final spec is here. http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2016-nintendo-switch-spec-analysis and the analysis of the other leak is here; http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1334549 It seems to me the original eurogamer spec is more accurate. While I agree the Nvidia gpu is more capable than its gflops figure indicates compared to wii u its important you don't just run away with ridiculous performance claims. The same comparison was made with the wii u over ps3 and 360 and the end result was not that the wii u easily beat them despite the lower gflops figure it actually struggled despite the generational difference. Remember the gflops figure is an indication of its performance level allowing for its later architecture. What was fantastic performance of 250 gflops in 2005 is pretty much base level now. Lets not forget if the wii u has 176 gflops for its main gpu and up to 24 gflops asisst from its wii gpu plus 70GB/s of high speed memory for its frame buffer that is pretty good compared to 150 gflops and 25.6GB/s shared memory. When I say a overall 30% increase I'm not exactly being unfair I'm giving the nvidia alot of allowance for its later architecture possibly too much. |
The Foxconn rumor is the true one, not eurogamer. They're the only leak that knewabout the neon color controllers.







