Same Old Nintendo - KindaFunnyGames

[Alkibiádēs]

Normchacho said:

Alkibiádēs said:

He's a Playstation fan who has no intention of buying the console, but can't help but constantly post negative stuff towards it. 

If it was easy to hit homerun then he should make a console instead. Otherwise it's just big words, but no substance. 

$300 for a powerful handheld that can also be played on the TV with improved resolution/framerate, I'll take it. Much better than releasing a weak 240p handheld in 2011 for $250 with zero interesting games in its first year. You know, the 3DS...

The 3DS was weaker than a Gamecube while the Switch is more powerful than the Wii U, even when undocked. And just for $50 more, yeah, I'll take it.

Esqueezeme?

 

"Your post is pretty much exactley what I'm saying. Nintendo probably saw that maybe half of all Wii U owners didn't also own a 3DS, realized that they could provide a better product to that 50-60 million person block of gamers by leaving behind a 6-7 million block of gamers.

It makes total sense for Nintendo. But if you're like me, as in someone who just wants to sit in front of his tv with a normal controller and play Nintendo games, you'd be paying for a lot of stuff you're never going to use by buying the Switch."

 

I was actually really excited for the Switch event last week and had every intention of picking up the system. Maybe not at launch, but probably around when Mario Odessy came out. Now? I don't know...certainly not anytime soon.

It's called the Gamecube, it's Nintendo's second worst selling console. Sounds narrow-minded to me by the way. How do you know a game like Arms won't be fun unless you try it? How do you know the HD rumble doesn't add value to the overall gameplay? Immersion is an important element of playing games.