By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Lucas-Rio said:
Insidb said:

I don't see what's wrong with the logic that $300 for a home/handheld console that is significantly less powerful than 2 other, significantly older, well-supported, and very available consoles is a lot to ask of a consumer.

That's the most expansive "handheld" since a lot of time. Even more expansive than the Vita in its time.

The pricing is out of its world.... Nintendo should have gone with AMD if it meant an affordable console.

They're in a tough spot: market it as a very expensive handheld that you can play on your TV or as a close-to-average priced home console that you can play on the go.