By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KLXVER said:
onionberry said:

yeah but from $299 in 2017 to $499-$599 in 2006 without a game is a bit much don't you think? I understand what you're saying but there's a big gap there.

Well there was a big gap in technology as well. Blu ray players alone was more expensive than the PS3 at the time of launch. Its just what you consider to have value for you.

true, a ps3 was a good option if you wanted a blu ray.