By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Goodnightmoon said:
JEMC said:

Maybe the news is that they can't sell it for less than 300$ or even include a game for that amount. Because if that's what Reggie is trying to say, it means that Nintendo won't be able to react and make a price drop if sales aren't as high as they want/need without having big losses.

But what is he supposed to say anyways? "Nah this thing is cheap but we sell it at 300 to see if we can have profits and if things go wrong we go down to 250$ and solved" or something on the lines? wether he is right or not on his answer that's the logical thing to answer anyways.

What he should have said is nothing. He can't say that they didn't include a game because the console is already 300$ because there's no possible defense for that. They have either screwed up the hardware cost again, which would be a repeat of Wii U's mistake, or they are ripping us.

A gently silence would have been a much better answer than what he said.



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.