| Cloudman said: I do agree that they're being greedy with things like the accessories, but I don't agree with comparing the switch to the PS4 price and bundle now. It'd make more sense to compare it to the PS4 and XBO when they 1st launched, which PS4 was 399 with no game, and XBO was... 499 only at the time? I don't think any game either. And then with paid online, that's being going on since XBL. Sure you get more for paying for the service, but they're still asking you for extra money on something that used to be free. So yeah, nothing new here... The accessories though, yeah, too much. They all need to be lowered. |
First of all, comparing the Switch with PS4/XB1 makes prefect sense since this is the closest competition Nintendo has. That's like saying you don't compare the price points of two different cars when you're out shopping for a new car; one car being a few years older, but have come down in price, and a newer car with full price. Of course you compare them! "What else do I get for this price?"
Secondly, I'm opposed paid online, period. BUT, MS and Sony is adding more value to their subscribtions than Nintendo seem to be doing. With PSN+ you get 6 games A MONTH for as long as you're payinf for said subscribtion. In Nintendo's case, you'll get ONE 20-30 year old game FOR A MONTH - so it's basically renting a game for a month. But hey, if the paid online service only is $10, that'll be sweet as hell - but if it costs $50, then Nintendo can suck it. What's new with Nintendo's online service is the shittiness of it, of the low value of the service.
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.
