RolStoppable said:
It looks like a big uphill battle because you apply symmetrical thinking to competition that is asymmetrical. Switch is the only console that plays Nintendo games. (Important because Nintendo is always among the publishers who sell the most games.) The catch with asymmetrical competition is that the value evaluation that is made by any given consumer can completely turn upside down to what you think is the only correct way. You highlighted strengths of the PS4 and XB1, but they can't compete with what I have listed. They stand absolutely no chance. This is how the Wii beat the PS3 and 360 despite the gaming industry clearly favoring the HD consoles. When I say price is an issue for Switch, then it's not in relation to what the PS4 and XB1 cost. The price is an issue because the consumer that is attracted by Nintendo generally does not put a value on specs and sees the console merely as a tool that plays games. Even if the Switch was a 10 teraflop machine, I would still call the launch price too high. |
The Wii U also could play Nintendo games. This has a poor launch lineup, and is $300.
Made a bet with LipeJJ and HylianYoshi that the XB1 will reach 30 million before Wii U reaches 15 million. Loser has to get avatar picked by winner for 6 months (or if I lose, either 6 months avatar control for both Lipe and Hylian, or my patrick avatar comes back forever).







