Can we agree Nintendo should go third party, now?

[Darc Requiem]

BraLoD said:

Darc Requiem said:
This stupid topic rears it's ugly head again. How did going third party work for Sega. Sega was a top notch developer that make a great game in any genre. Now you just hope they release something decent. I don't agree with a lot of the things Nintendo does but part of what allows them to make the types of games that they do is creating their on platform. People complain about Nintendo making too many Mario and Zelda titles. That would only get worse as a 3rd party developer. You could kiss IPs like Fire Emblem goodbye.

Sega went third party out of need, because they failed more than they should have taken with the Saturn, Dreamcast and handhelds combo, if they had went on their own intention the story could have been way different.

Do you want Nintendo to keep failing until they take a measure out of desperation and being unprepared, or to make a good use of their IPs and so it the right way? Nintendo may not need it, but they should do it.

Nintendo is in a better financial position than Sony.  They are the most financially responsible company in the industry. The fact that you are making this argument and making this thread in general shows your ignorance on the subject. Nintendo's business model and Nintendo's philosophy don't jive with becoming a third party developer.