By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
tak13 said:
zorg1000 said:
Having a seperate 3DS successor goes against everything that Nintendo has been trying to do for the last few years.

First they merged the handheld & consoles teams of their software & hardware divisions then they released a device that functions as both a handheld & console.

It's pretty clear that going forward Nintendo just wants to support one single hardware ecosystem.

You and soundwave  reiterating that...

Why seperate 3DS successor  means automatically segregated librady? Switch and ''HDS'' can have the same games, you know... And If you think then, that one of the devices would be redundant , read below.

 

Hybrid console is screwing  those people who don't care for home gaming on tv, were they buying 3DS at 250$ ? ;)... 

It's perfect for home console gamers, because they will have the option to continue the game that they were playing on tv lying on sofa, anywhere else inside/outside  home and in every way they want, also for those who like both gaming styles, because for only 250$ you have a hanheld and stationary console...

Nintendo has cited that they won't sell the handheld device standalone... And if they would, the machine is too elongated! Certaintly that thing which releases  on march shouldn't replace 3DS, they should make a cheaper, more portable  and maybe weaker switch mini redisign without the dock as soon as possible, albeit that wouldn't be switch, switch is two consoles, this would be a seperate 3ds successor even if it had the switch brand.

More than 6-7m million and counting  people, have bought a 2DS!

what you are describing is nothing more than a redesign which would still make Switch the 3DS successor.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.