Soundwave said:
The TV dock barely adds anything to the cost of the Switch I'd bet. Switch is basically the evolution of the Nintendo portable line hardware wise GBA = portable SNES+ Nintendo DS = portable N64/PSOne 3DS = portable PS2/GCN Switch = portable 360/Wii U+ It's where the Nintendo portable line was going anyway, the only thing is once you get to 360/PS3 tier graphics, those graphics look good enough on a TV, so you might as well have a TV output option. That doesn't make the system cost 2x more or something. Nintendo console enhusiasts are really the ones getting the shaft here, if you only play at home, you are being given a "console" that is hugely compromised for portable play and paying for a bunch of stuff (LCD display, built-in battery) that you don't need. Nintendo portable fans don't have much/anything to complain about, this is the 3DS successor. What would a "HDS" even be? A dual screen PS3/360. Well that's basically what Switch is, it just gives you one large screen insead of dividing things up into two smaller displays. |
HDS should be that... 3DS X TABLET Keeping common library as it has more advantages than disadvantages* , needless to mention them since you have covered me in previous comments of yours.
* ( the only is if mario kart 9 on hybrid would sell as much mario kart 9 on home console and Mario kart 10 on handheld consoles would sell combined )
Perfect for those who love dual screens and for those who find clamshell design embarassing!
Personlly, I'm fearing of many 3DS ownrs who don't care about home consoles won't be buying switch which may seem to them pricey and not very portable! There is huge risk, Nintendo handheld console unlike home console are always commercially successful business for Nintendo... ;)









