Is it to drastic to throw away the data after limitation are put on voting such as only getting one vote and not letting guest vote. I know there has been a lot of votes taken it just seems like at the moment the system is ripe for manipulation from both sides. I mean just as an example Ninja Gaiden Sigma a game no one outside of Japan should of played except as a demo is higher that Legend of Zelda OoT but Ninja Gaiden which at the moment has sold more copies w/w and is essentially the same game has a 6.9 rating. Just seems like you could say over time it would balance out but after restrictions are put in those that have voted hundreds of times for games will have a disproportionate weight on where it is ultimatly placed as opposed to those that first use the voting system after restictions are put in place. I mean its not about all Nintendo or Sony or Microsoft games being in the top just about the games individual people think were great deserve to be right? I don't mind FF7 up there but do think having no xbox games at all is ridiculous and even though I never really got into the Metal Gear games having all 3 up there seems a little ridiculous if these are the top games we ever played.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
