By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
bigtakilla said:
Brii said:

I'd argue that having no widely agreed upon flaws doesn't by default make something better than something that has flaws but is a more enjoyable experience. But it just comes down to individual standards and feelings, in the end. Neither of our feelings are more valid than the others. My argument was mostly to not put so much value on a score.

But experience is percieved. As a game, it is worse then XIII.

Being better or worse as a game is subjective based on individual perception and standards of what makes a 'good' or 'bad' game. Not everything is as good as the sum of its parts for many people. You find it to be worse, but plenty here seem to disagree. It's all subjective. No one can really definitively say one way or another. It's all just their personal feelings on the matter.

Basically, opinions yo.