By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Captain_Yuri said:
KLXVER said:

Well then we are very different gamers. I would always take 2 great games over 1.

That we are but what about the people that only want one console? Having a ps4/x1 or ps3/360 would have given you majority of the popular multiplats out there. Having a wiiU wouldn't. If Nintendo invested on third party ports, then more people would be more inclined to look at the wiiU compared to it not having those big multiplats. Why? Cause the wiiU has one unique thing that the other consoles doesn't and that is Nintendo games.

Similar situation with the switch with the added functionality of being able to take your games anywhere. Yea it will look worse but being able to play the big third party games anywhere as well as being able to play Nintendo games is a big benefit (as long as it has those games) even if it sacrafices graphics because people do like Nintendo games. Its just I think most people would rather have Nintendo games + big third party games than Nintendo games and niche third party games.

And of course, its not like Nintendo can't invest on those niche games after the console has started being a success... Cause that is when they will have loads of money to throw around which will be enough to cover both niche and popular games.

Well if you only get one console, then you miss out on the exclusives on other consoles. Nintendo cant keep paying for every big multi platform title and getting only a few wont help them anyway. They had COD, AC and Batman on WiiU, but that did fuck all. Sure it would be cool to have the big games on the go, but that is up to every publisher to decide. Im sure Bayonetta 2 did more for the WiiU than any big AAA port did.