pokoko said:
That is not semantics at all. "The ends justifies the means" never works because it's never fair. Who is going to decide that case-by-case interpretation of the law? What is your criteria for when it's okay to ignore legality? That's the whole reason why we made entrapment illegal in the United States. The idea of giving people medals when they break the law if they can prove someone else broke the law first would just lead to anarchy. Would you mind if someone broke into your house because they thought you might have have something illegal there? |
It's not fair that their corrupt actions were exposed?
Feel free to keep defending it. In the end, you're defending their corruption. If they were never guilty of shitty practices, then I my empathize with them. Instead, they were exposed to be shitbags, so fuck'em.
Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:
www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames







