CGI-Quality said:
I called it impulsive because it ignores the very trends of the thread material. It also positions doom on a company for no good reason at all. It then goes as far as making outlandish claims about Activision's business decisions (why this is ignored by a few of you is troubling, but it is what it is). Also, the "insiders" on GAF are suddenly propped, but I recall several of you making claims that we shouldn't take anything from that site seriously. Bottom line, before this month, very few gave "multiple bundles" on Amazon much weight, particularly when they were losing to a console that held the #1-#3 spots on the hourlies. So you mustn't believe that Amazon can accurately predict the outcome of NPD anymore. Only logical explanation for your continued skepticism. |
What trends were being ignored?
I don't know if it was for no good reason. All he did was say that Sony doesnt deserves to be the #1 console in December because of the lack of variety bundles. Also if this was the case why did you only quote the part when he said XB1 could win the month?
So we can't question how a company runs their business now? I see nothing wrong with saying Activision should have made Sony bundle Cod a lot quicker especially when their competition is getting mass bundled and also overall getting more love.
Who made these claims about the neogafers? I know i didn't and in the November NPD thread didn't you say you trust some neogafers?