By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
jason1637 said:

Disagree with things his company has done in the past that he had no involvement in doesn't make his statement hyproactial. It just means he doesn't support the buisness practices MS has done before he became head of Xbox.

Negative. If he engaged in it, at any point, he's being hypocritical here. No amount of excusing it will eliminate that. He may have had a change of heart (market positions can obviously effect that), but he certainly can be linked directly to a scenario he now condemns.

We still had to promote it because the deal had already been made. If he didnt he probably would have been fired of even arrested for breaking a deal that probably had lots money involved. If he didnt make the deal and became head when it was all said and done he has to still market it because its his job. 

AngryLittleAlchemist said:
jason1637 said:

Lol i didnt know a series thats known for getting late 80s to 90s like Forza is shit or a game like Gears of War 4 that got good reviews is shit. I must have missed something.

Actually I haven't played Forza, it looks kind of cool but mostly the Horizon series.  Want to pick up 3 eventually. 

Uhm...ya....because critics are DEFINITELY IN TUNE with how gamers feel. Gears of War forumns are all positive. Game's population is all positive. game's sales are all positive. Lol. 

Wait so you havent played forza but called it a shitty sports game lol. 

Gears 4 has a 4.5/5 on the Xbox store(only people that own the game can rate it). It was the 9th best selling digital game on consoles for the month of Nov.