By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SWORDF1SH on 23 December 2016
Edit Thread
Rafie said:
Madword said:

That might be the case, but surely a whole game is worse than just some delayed DLC... though to be fair, I really was annoyed when MS did the whole Fallout 3 DLC as It was a game i loved, so i guess it depends on the franchise, but yes stopping a group of people getting a game is far worse than some DLC.

The only way I see that as fair is if that company paid for the resources for development. You know...like Street Fighter 5 and Dead Rising 3. I don't know why some people use Street Fighter 5 as an example. Is it because Capcom said that they game would have eventually come out a few years down the road? What about Dead Rising 3?

This thread is both interesting and sad at the same time. Both of them do it..hell even Nintendo does this (Monster Hunter/ Phoenix Wright..etc). Hehehe I just noticed that every game that I mentioned here is a Capcom game. Go figure!

Yeah there are opinions if it's right or wrong but that's not what the thread op and most of the people are talking about. Some think Phil is being a hypocrite speaking against these sort of deals. Some are defending him. Some good points being made both sides of the fence.