By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TheGreatOther said:
Goodnightmoon said:

Yes it is debatable, just because you don't think there were a good number of good games on the console doesn't mean we all have to think the same you know? The console has some of the best games of the gen and even of the history, games you couldn't find on any other console btw, and for the price of the console it offered you a great value since the beggining.

It had some good exclusives sure, but you need more than that, ultimately it's about the overall library not just a bunch of exclusives.

An here's the problem Wii had, look at the top 10 highest rated IPs of last generation:

Super Mario Galaxy

Grand Theft Auto

Uncharted

Bioshock

The Last of Us

Mass Effect

Batman 

The Elder Scrolls

LittleBigPlanet

Red Dead Redemption

 

Out of those the number available on each console:

Wii: 1

360: 6

PS3: 9

If you go down the list and get into top 20, or top 50, or top 100 Wii still runs into this similar problem.

The library of Wii is objectively bad unless you're a hardcore Nintendo fan.

Objectively bad my ass, half of the games on that list don't deserve to be there to begging with, Metacritic is not God, look the shitty MGSV with a 95 on XBO, that's"Objective"? lol

 Mario Galaxy 1, Mario galaxy 2 and Xenoblade Chronicles are already 3 of the best games ever made and you don't need to be a fucking Nintendo fan to see it, only a gamer with criteria.

Also, is lovely how you choose to forget than Twilight Princess should be on that list too as it has the same exact score as half of the includd games, very "objective"...