By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
AngryLittleAlchemist on 22 December 2016
Edit Thread
spemanig said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:

This is a good point , and I honestly think that the Switch probably will get decent ports if they run at 720p on tvs. Hell some might even be 1080 depending on how well the software aspect of the system makes it easy to develop for. 

I just wish we were getting a slightly better deal for the money, although I guess if you want that you should just build a PC yourself but whatever. 

I like the hardware, so I don't care how inferior the specs are. As long as it gets the multiplats. Unless there's a version that runs at 60fps on the PS4/XBO, I'm getting the Switch version for the flexability. If the 4G LTE rumor is true, and I can play online games one the road or at work without connecting to faulty Wifi, it will be way worth the trade off in prettiness. Superior convenience will outweigh inferior specs for me.

I agree. Understand that I have a PC and PS4, so for me personally, exclusives are much more important. I just think *most* gamers  could get a better value from this even at the same price range, hence why i'm complaining. It's always important to push a pro-consumer point. 

I also have to say that being 4x more powerful than Wii U is great docked, I'm a bit disappointed that it's only a little more powerful undocked BECAUSE it means Nintendo might use the same graphics from their other games for another generation. It means we get another generation of games that look similiar to  Wii U games. And don't get me wrong, Wii U games look pretty good,  but I think it would be cool to see Nintendo push their art and graphics even more. 

 

This just puts more possiblity behind the idea that the Mario Kart and Splatoon games showed are actual sequels(something I'm hoping for).