curl-6 said:
zorg1000 said:
No, but like I said, a survey that doesnt quantify anything is pretty useless. If it was a survey of like 1000 people and over 3/4 of them are 18-24 year old males than that doesnt really respresent the market as a whole since every non 18-24 male is under represented.
PS4 trouncing XBO/Wii U is proof of nothing since both those devices had a plethora of other things going against them. Thats like me saying 3DS dominating Vita is proof that people love glasses free 3D. Correlation vs causation.
The "everybody would still be playing Atari or NES if power didnt matter" is one of the dumbest arguments ever because it completely takes things out of context.
Nobody is saying graphics should stop evolving, it means graphics are not the be all, end all of gaming.
|
I never said any of it was proof, but it's all evidence and you haven't offered any evidence that graphics aren't important.
|
Im not saying they arent important, im saying that you are giving graphics too much credit.
Heres my evidence, Gameboy vs Game Gear/Lynx, PS1 vs N64, PS2 vs GC/XB, GBA vs N-Gage, DS vs PSP, Wii vs 360/PS3, 3DS vs Vita. Multiple examples from the last 30 years where the weaker device not only won, but dominated.
Power didnt all of a sudden become the most important factor for the gaming market in the last 3 years.
