NATO said:
The pixel C is *SIGNIFICANTLY* thinner than the switch, at only 7mm thick compared to the switch at 24+mm thick, so the switch should have plenty of space for a much better battery, yet it doesn't. But it's Nintendo, are you really that surprised? They have a reputation for cheaping out, take the WiiU gamepad, it has a battery slot much bigger than the battery it ships with.. then they sell a bigger battery separately.. |
The Pixel C packs a 9000 mah battery. It also costed US$ 500. In the best case, Nintendo could pack a battery with 5000 mah on a 7' form factor, so they already got half the juice. 13 hours in web browsing probably translate to 6 or 7 gaming in the Pixel.
However, the screen on the Pixel is much bigger and brighter and the native resolution is much higher, so we could expect that this, combined with the underclock would provide a similar battery life to the Switch.