AngryLittleAlchemist on 19 December 2016
| anthony64641 said: Lets be honest here. more powerful than the Wii U, but not on par with the PS4, is more then enough for a handheld. If the switch was on par with the PS4 but had a price tag of 350$USD~ (same as WiiU). It would failed. Nintendo knows what there doing. In Jan2017, Im looking forward to games, no specs. Dont want the switch to be another vita |
That's not true at all. The majority of the gaming world(you know...The west) already primarily views the Switch as a home console WITH THE ADDED BENEFIT of being mobile-capable. They probably would have spent 350$ on it easily with Mario and Zelda. It's just ridiculous that people eat up these kind of excuses.
But honestly...I don't believe these rumors. But let's say they are true, then Nintendo STILL could have made this more powerful than it is at 250$. AGAIN, ASSUMING these rumors are really...why is Nintendo using such a low amount of the GPU? Why is the architecture maxwell instead of Pascal? Why have a cooling fan when you're using so little of the performance capable? Why make it WORSE than the Tegra X1? ETC
