bdbdbd said:
I assume by caucasian you mean white people (caucasoid) and not Caucasians, as Caucasian would be Turkish/Iranian/Georgian etc. Yes, you did not see them doing that. And I don't think you'd be seeing it now either, if the Clinton campaign had not been a racist attack against these people. I don't think it's right that innocent people suffer from it, but we'd see the opposite if Clinton had won. It really doesn't matter what BLM was started as, what matters is what it is today. The Clinton rhetorics is much closer to Hitler than what Trumps is. I think Sanders had won against Trump. |
Just like it doesn't matter what Trump said during his presidency but what he says today, which will also change, and change again?
Clinton's rhetorics don't involve shaming and disgracing entire races as she's white and supports all races...which is what america should be about.
You know what I mean, WHITE PEOPLE. I tried to be sensitive. I don't think we'd see the opposite. If we did, it wouldn't be because minorites started it. If you're the underdog and you get a victory of course you're going to celebrate. But I don't think hispanics would have shamed whites as it doesn't happen already.







