Gourmet on 15 December 2016
the-pi-guy said:
How does a scientist being exposed as a fraud, mean that climate change might also be a fraud? In fact, it should be shown as more evidence. A private collection of bones were found to be fraudalent, and yet the public air that everyone has access to, should be even easier to fact check. So it should have a higher probability of being shown to be false, than the bones. |
The problem is how little the community cares. No one ever questioned it. The police were responsible for sorting out a MAJOR fraud. And later the publication venues did not even bother to apologize.
