By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
VGPolyglot said:
Mr Puggsly said:

That's the thing about left wingers like yourself, you focus on situations where people may have lost their job, maybe health issues, and they could no longer support a family.

What I'm telling you is a lot of women start a family with a useless man and no job skills and that's a significant cause of poverty. Statistically many single mother don't even have a high school diploma.

Wealth redistribution doesn't solve poor life decisions, it enables that behavior and eventually you have a country going broke. I mean poverty could go down drastically if people just made better life decisions. But hey, that's just my right wing logic.

I don't support wealth redistribution. I support a system where wealth doesn't need to be redistributed in the first place. I also don't support the existence of states or even money. Instead, I support a system where people work according to their ability and get according to their needs.

So basically you support communism in which you have a little more choice what you are going to be. Not a very favourable opinion in the US probably, since its the capitalistic centre of the world. I like technology and concurrency in a free market so I strongly oppose to a communist system. The Soviet Union and eastern Germany have shown it doesn't work and deprived companies of innovation. If the wealth over the world or even the United States is equally spreaded quite a lot of people will become much poorer.



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar