Safiir said:
My point was that if a PS4, which is a vastly more powerful console, can be sold at 200$ (and obviously not at a loss or at least a small loss) a bare-bones switch should not cost more than 150$. |
Indeed. And the better your price point, the more consoles you can sell, which means higher game sales potential. Win/win. Because game and accessory profits are where the VAST majority of profits are. That's the thing about the WiiU that drove me crazy. $349 for aaaaaaaaages, and while it had some very good titles for it, it was simply too expensive to find a decent market penetration and install base.
If a 'headless' Switch was made for $149, and as a result they sold an extra ~12 million units over the life of the unit, multiply that by the attach rate average, and you can compute the extra income and profits Nintendo would make. Price is a big deal.







