tak13 said:
Enough with that... Fat ds replaced gba in the time period you cite. It sold only 18m in two years, the real damage was made by ds lite in gba's 5th year-6th year! Fat ds had a very slow start and didn't really have any significant effect in gba sales, plus that gba was in decline before fat ds release... GBA would have barely sold 100m if it hasn't had a successor in 2004. The unpleasant thing is the decline in NA but 3DS will have sold 25m+ there, that's very good but in Japan where smartphon gaming is bigger, 3DS has stomped gba. What will Nintendo do? Mobile games for Nintendo are a synergy with their core business, it won't become their focus. Look what Pokemon go did for 3DS and Pokemon S/M!
What? 3DS sales in its first three years are the same with gba's... Go check it! My reply to normchacho pertains to you too.. Guys, fat ds only sold 18m in two years, gba was almost unaffected by it. DS lite was its real successor, which came in gba's 5th-6th year ... |
"Only 18 million" dude, 18 million is substantial, and even then, the DS Lite came earlier in the GBA's life than we currently are in the 3DS's life. So I don't get why you keep repeating this. It's correct but it doesn't take anything away from the point here. The GBA would've sold substantially more if it had been replaced as late as the 3DS, and the 3DS and Vita will still end up below that, and handhelds will likely decrease from this gen to the next one as well. This doesn't mean dedicated handheld gaming will die, but it won't sell as much any more.








