superchunk said:
The Jaguar is a low-powered, low-end mobile CPU. Jaguar is less powerful than a Intel i3 core. Its just not a powerful CPU. http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/189706-nintendo-switch/74543387 Additionally, latest is that NS is using a new Tegra SOC that uses BIG.little with an A73 and A57. The A73 is significantly a better chip. (see my comparison thread referenced in sig) Also, x86 and ARM... its just not a difference anyone should care about anymore. Hit up comparisons of ARM vs i3 and i5 desktop chips, better of equivalent in benchmarks. Industry is moving towards ARM for many reasons and all middleware supports port between the two without issue. Even AMD is moving https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/221282-amds-first-arm-based-processor-the-opteron-a1100-is-finally-here |
I see you think the Switch will have a pretty much standard Tegra SOC and not the spec given for the development kit.
I don't think your right there but will be very happy if you are.








