By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
bowserthedog said:

You're obviously not one of the 1000 people who just had their job saved. 


I'd sooner set a bad prescendent in saving jobs then pay Iran for a peace deal. That shows any crazy country how to beat the United States. Start building nukes then cash in.

He saved about 900 jobs while losing 1100 in the process with all the leverage in the world (or country) behind him. To me that's not great negotiation. This wasn't even a big number, lol 2000 jobs is nothing. If this is the best he can do in this situation, what's he's going to accomplish with little/no leverage? 10% of jobs saved instead of 45%? 

Carrier was a very easy case, they are deeply tied to the US gov't. This is like picking a fight with the skinniest/weakest looking kid and still getting a bloody nose out of it. What are you going to do when you have to actually someone bigger? 

Actually a "pay for peace" deal with Iran is much more preferable than the alternative. You want to go fight on the front lines in a war in Iran? Or send your son/daughter to do so? Didn't think so. Easy to war hawk when someone else is the one who's going to have to potentially actually fight.