I have failed. I bought a 4K TV!

[Azuren]

Raistline said:

I'd say that was a good deal.
$100 off current retail pricing for a good sized TV.
It has decent tech using the HD10 spec (sadly no Dolby Vision HDR),
It is a 240hz model (which for best picture quality in movies you should to turn Fast Motion plus off except for the following instances, watching sports, gaming, or watching movie that was created in HRF).
That model is edge lit so you will see some light bleed in pure dark scenes in a dark room but will otherwise be unnoticeable. The TV does have the best contrast outside of Array lit, and OLED TV's.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but there isn't a TV out there aside from the Z9D that can even fully utilize Dolby Vision. DV needs a 12-bit panel to be fully utilized, and the only thing that has that or more is the Z9D (14-bit). LG can talk a big game, but DV just doesn't perform that much better.

 

EDIT: Reading more of your post, I can't help but feel you shouldn't be recommending TV's.

 

1. There isn't a 2016 TV that runs at 240hz. That would be the "motion rating" of 240, and is also only in relation to 1080p. 4K sources only run at 60hz/120MR. 

 

2. Higher refresh rates don't make TVs smoother. Plugging 60hz into a 120hz doesn't turn the source into 120hz. What makes TVs look smoother is the motion rating.