By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KiigelHeart said:
DonFerrari said:

Because I can snuff from over a dozen km distance when people intend to use "over 50% digital sales" (without any data to back it up) to say the game didn't really sold only that.

This is a thread comparing UC to GoW, so when addressing that GoW sales are smaller because of digital sales is basically putting that only one of the two were impacted by it.

Well it didn't really sell only that, digital sales are more significant now than they were before :) Obviously it goes for both Sony and MS games. No-one said that only one of the two were impacted by it, or even suggested something like that. GoW4 I'm sure is more affected by digital sales than GoW3 though, especially with its digital pricing and early access. It still sold much less than GoW3 which is disappointing, but it's another studio making the game now and I'm hopeful they can make the franchise bigger again.

Well, so you lost so many discussions about SW sales this gen, because all the time there are suggestions to try and justify that MS games sell much more than Sony on digital (to justify very different total sales).



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."