Torillian said:
Dulfite said:
You mean the same science that is constantly telling us, one year, that something is healthy, and three years later tells us it causes some deadly thing, and then four years later tells us that was all just a misunderstanding? The same science that tells us that cells were the smallest building block, then corrects itself saying its atoms, then correct itself and says its basis? The same science that was clueless about dark matter for years? Science has nothing to do with facts, it is just a neverending grind to the realization that we, as humans, never have, do not now, and never will fully understand the universe in our own capacity. I'm positive that there is a catch to this "super fruit" that "science" will no doubt reveal to us (only to contradict that revelation years later).
Honestly, it's like people act like science should always be trusted when, historically speaking, it is always disproving itself to the point that it never should have been trusted in the first place. It is all nonsense.
|
Science is the best understanding we currently have of the universe given the information available. The fact that our general understanding of the universe is constantly evolving to accomodate more data as they become available is a feature not a bug.
|
My point is that it will be a never ending "evolving" process, if you will, and yet we have people claiming *insert one of the hundreds/thousands of "scientific breakthroughts" discovered every year here* that whatever discovery is made is absolute and revolutionary, only to claim it was misguided years later. If a company kept coming out with a new phone every year, claiming it will do so and so features and it never lived up the expectation, would you keep buying products from them or start to put your trust in another company?
