Currently Online 
| Insidb said: Wrong! If Trump used the campaign as a personal fundraiser, through the aforementioned loans, etc., it's pretty relevant to how ethically he operates. He also switched over the GOP donors (Sheldon? Sheldon? Sheldon?), once he was nominated. As far as representing the suits, who do you think finances his RE projects, who do you think owns the buildings that pay his licensing fees, who do you think financed his recapitalizations, etc.? They're the same banks! There's a very real chance that Trump is the Kremlin candidate. Anyone who wants to put any research into this will see his close connections to Russian oligarchs and the Russian mafia. It was in the news, but everyone was too busy talking about p*ssies, foundations, or universities. These are very bad people; google them. It's real. |
Alright. I looked this up, and Trump reportedly paid around 8 million dollars of the campaign funds to his own businesses. Okay? Maybe this would be a big deal if he had actually profited off of this, but he still personally paid out 50 million dollars more than his businesses took in. And the money going to his businesses would still have to be distrubted among employees and other operating costs. It's a pretty big strech to call this a "personal fundraiser".
You do realize there's a big difference between doing business with someone and supporting someone in a political campaign, right? You're saying that these banks support Donald Trump because they lend money to him, which is something that banks generally do for their clients. That's like saying that Walmart supports members of the KKK because they can purchase goods there.
Anyone can see his close connections to Russia... except the FBI, apparently. If you're so sure that Trump is controlled by Russia, I wonder why no one is reporting on that now that the election is over? Oh, right, because it was never based in reality and was merely an attempt to slander Trump.
