windbane on 30 May 2008
| Man said: The key difference between Red Steel 2 and Killzone 2, is that while both orignal games sucked for the most part, Red Steel was a launch game that was rushed to be released on time. Thats why it wasnt very good (at least according to Ubi), and theyve stated that they will take more time and perfect the second, hence peoples excitement for Red Steel 2. Please tell me why you think Killzone 2 will be any different to 1, because to me, the situation for Killzone 2 seems to be exactly the same as the first... |
Well if Ubisoft says they will make it better, who am I to disagree? Afterall, I hear all the time from developers that their sequel will suck just as hard as the original. Ubisoft's comments are refreshing. Again... We have seen nothing of Red Steel 2. Killzone 2 looks better than anything else coming out by that time. Not many games of that graphical quality suck. It could very well suck, but there is a lot more reason to be excited for Killzone 2. I'm not sure why that's so hard to accept. It's not like I'm saying Killzone 2 wll be awesome, I'm saying the comparison is unjustified at this point.
