By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
trestres said:
windbane said:
yushire said:
So because Red Steel have less quality than other games doesnt mean it dont warrant a sequel? Even it sold 1 million units so far and one of the most popular games on the Wii so far?

Lets take an example, what about 50 cent bulletproof? Its a crappy game but its sales and popularity warrant it a sequel (and there is a sequel of it.)

What are you, a publisher? I don't care how much a game sells. Game sales do not effect my excitement level for a game. We have no evidence that Red Steel 2 is even in the middle of development. trestres, fanboy extraordinaire, compares the strange excitement over a sequel to a below-average game to a sequel that at least looks very good and shows promise. There is far more reason to be excited for a game that we have seen game video for than a game that we haven't even seen a screenshot of.


 LOL calling me fanboy after hyping RS2, which I really regret, cause it will suck, but you hype Killzone 2?? HAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAhAH Gimme a break man, that game was MEDIOCRE at best, I don't know how can you expect its sequel to be good, really tell me, just cause it looks good? Lair and Haze say "Howdy Ho"


I showed you the gamerankings scores. There's a difference there. There's also the difference of Killzone 2 looking so good. Lair and Haze never looked like the best graphical games out. Those games are usually overrated (Gears) but rarely turn out to be crap. If a developer is capable of making games look good with good framerate they can generally pull off a decent game. I was not hyping anything, though, I am merely saying that your comparison to Killzone 2 is a little off. You brought it up, not me. Edit: btw, I was not calling you a fanboy based on 1 post. please. I think you've admitted to being one.