By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
windbane said:
yushire said:
So because Red Steel have less quality than other games doesnt mean it dont warrant a sequel? Even it sold 1 million units so far and one of the most popular games on the Wii so far?

Lets take an example, what about 50 cent bulletproof? Its a crappy game but its sales and popularity warrant it a sequel (and there is a sequel of it.)

What are you, a publisher? I don't care how much a game sells. Game sales do not effect my excitement level for a game. We have no evidence that Red Steel 2 is even in the middle of development. trestres, fanboy extraordinaire, compares the strange excitement over a sequel to a below-average game to a sequel that at least looks very good and shows promise. There is far more reason to be excited for a game that we have seen game video for than a game that we haven't even seen a screenshot of.


 How soon we forget the details of that shitfest Killzone.  This is a developer who had people hyped before release, the game billed as Sony's Halo killer simply because of the pretty graphics and Sony backing.  Upon release it was a buggy, bland and average first person shooter not worth the plastic it was printed on.  Fast forward to today, what's different?  Only thing I see different is the developer has dropped one turd and is peddling the same shit.  They haven't proven themselves, they dropped the ball the first time and now it's best to wait and see if they can actually execute for once.